Waraku Education

Ideas, experiments and observations as they occur [and I have time] relating to teaching and learning in a secondary school - special focus on ICT.

Friday, April 27, 2007

Peer produced knowledge sharing in education

What are the practical and philosophical challenges in using technologies for ‘peer produced’ knowledge sharing?

A response to the Jimmy Wales seminar in Adelaide, 'Challenging how knowledge is created', 23/4/2007

If we were to leave the practicalities out of the picture for a minute I reckon that we could agree that core to teacher's hearts is unencumbered learning. We would all connect with the idea that we want to remove the encumbrances to learning for all children. So the idea of free access (free in both senses of the word – free as in beer and free as in libre) would resonate with teachers everywhere.

We can categorise the issues around peer publishing for educators into two main categories
1. The first is the classroom where we make use of peer produced materials and have students involved in the peer publishing process
2. The second relates to peer publishing for professional sharing

Classroom use

Teacher's technical skills.
Just as our teachers vary in height they vary in their technical skills. Generally speaking, the skills required to make web 2.0 peer publishing tools work are fairly minimal. So this is good news.

Education system filtering mechanisms generally eliminate online or peer publishing. The one size fits all filtering systems can fail to recognise the different needs of children as they grow and develop.

Infrastructure in schools tends to be focused on desktop applications with mainly web one level access because of the filtering system. School systems tend to be locked down rather than trying to build a community based on trust in our schools. We often think about systems from a systems perspective and so we want to protect the system and forget about the fact that education is trying to help us build a better society. Two of the core values for this is trust and respect. The accountability model rather than the gate keeper model that Jimmy Wales talked about is a key concept to making schools a better place and in so doing, make our society a better one. Acknowledging that children will make mistakes and this is important for their learning, having methods to easily undo or fix the damage is critical for system design.

We are at a time where we can provide an excellent learning environment where most of what we do is through a browser interface and using FOSS on the desktop. There are considerable advantages to this, one of them being cost.

Costs of bandwidth are still far too high for schools and the pipe is far too narrow.

Concerns about the accuracy of the information being published and shared.
Teachers often feel the need to ensure that all of the information presented to students is correct.

Concerns about being able to control the communications.
Student peer produced knowledge sharing involves publishing that can be used for inappropriate goals. A phrase that I have been hearing more of lately is that a good education is going to be messy and peer publishing certainly can be messy.

Nature of information is changing
We don't need to keep everything in our heads anymore. Information is disposable, used to complete current goals, probably document what we did and then move on.

Peer publishing offers students the possibility to learn about things that are of interest to them. The variety and depth of the information on Muppet Wiki is a great example.

As a final comment on classroom use, I like the idea of students preparing resources for other students.

Use for professional sharing

I have been intimately involved in the establishment of cegsa.org. It is a wiki for SA and NT senior secondary IT teachers to share learning and assessment resources. Working on the setting up of this has highlighted a number of issues relevant to this discussion.

How do we avoid copyright issues?

Should we enforce logins and only allow teachers into this space?

Why should I contribute when others aren't?

Feelings that my work is not complete and polished enough for sharing is a barrier to contributing

Some people feeling that the wiki markup is too hard to use.

It actually takes effort to share resources. Wouldn't it be good if we had a button on our browsers that said, 'Remember this Delicious,SACSA and SSABSA' and then presented us with a range of relevant tags that we could pick from.

There are too many places to log into these days and this takes time and too many credentials to remember.

The open sharing approach of peer publishing is somewhat chaotic and messy. There are not necessarily answers for everything on the wiki and for other things there is an abundance. Some teachers feel that we are doing the wrong thing and just want a text book – forget the wiki just point me in the direction of the approved text please.

As a closing remark, when you are working with others publishing your work in this way you develop a commitment to each other. It is a shared obligation and it is enjoyable. Peer publishing is great news for country folk where we have often felt left out of the PD loop. Now we are interacting with people in our fields globally. This of course has implications for our professional organizations like CEGSA and our employer.

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, April 26, 2007

Internet filtering system broken

John Travers has put his two bobs worth out there regarding internet filtering in response to some of the discussion that happened at the Jimmy Wales seminar in Adelaide. Sure administrators can upblock a site ATM, and they do, but the current filtering model starts from a negative position and that is not good. It is a deficit model that is not built around trust.

I want a better filtering system for schools that

  • respects the different needs of children as they grow and develop
  • promotes values of respect and trust
  • facilitates unencumbered learning
  • is respectful of the work of teachers

So what if we had a filtering system that

  • a teacher could turn on and off for a student for periods of time (ATM it is only administrators that can do this)
  • had various levels of filtering from very strong to none
  • where students could be assigned a level for filtered access that was consistent with their percieved trustworthiness and maturity
  • where this level was reviewed on an annual basis involving teachers, parents and students
  • displayed all access logs for all members of the school community to all members of that community
  • where community action was taken where people breached our expectations for appropriate conduct

I am not totally happy with this as a model but I have to start somewhere and it certainly better than the one size fits all model that we have. I also expect that the needs for filtering models will change with time just as the need for a person to walk in front of the early motor cars with a red flag disappeared with time.

Labels: , , ,

Saturday, April 07, 2007

How do you get to Grant High?

Wouldn't it be cool if you could customise an online map and send the link to visitors so that they knew who to get to a certain location?

What about students being able to place waypoints and markers on a map identifying important locations to their current research project.

We are going on a school excursion and want to allow parents to see exactly what our itenerary is?

I made one for getting to my school

The tool is Google Maps

Labels: ,

Goodnight Sue-ellen, Jimbob ........

I've been playing with Jimdo (reminded me of Jimbob) and I reckon that it is the easiest online and offline web creation tool I have found so far. The free version is limited by two text based advertisements being put on your site and 500mb of space.
For a student to make and publish a site for a school project - fantastic. It can even include RSS feeds. I made a small site to test it out.

Labels: , , ,